His videos rack up millions of views. Homeowners praise him. Builders hate him. And after one of the nation’s largest homebuilders tried to stop him, many thought this would be the end of his career. Instead, the final decision left people on both sides stunned. A viral Arizona home inspector, accused of harassment, falsification, and bullying, walked away with his license fully intact — and a much louder spotlight shining on his work.
The Inspector Builders Love to Hate
In Arizona’s booming housing market, one home inspector has become impossible to ignore. Porter, a Valley-based inspector, specializes in new construction homes, documenting what he finds during inspections and posting the results online.
His videos often show:
- Cracked foundations
- Improper drainage
- Roof and framing issues
- Code compliance problems
But more importantly, they explain homeowners’ rights under Arizona law — what builders must fix and when.
For many buyers, especially first-time homeowners, Porter’s videos have been eye-opening.
For at least one major builder, they were unacceptable.
The Complaint That Raised the Stakes
After Porter posted inspection videos involving homes built by Taylor Morrison, the company filed a formal complaint against him with the Arizona State Board of Technical Registration — the agency that regulates home inspectors and controls their licenses.
In the complaint, Taylor Morrison accused Porter of:
- Harassment
- Bullying
- Falsifying inspection findings
- Misleading the public through social media
The company called for disciplinary action, including the suspension of his license.
For Porter, the stakes couldn’t have been higher.
A Hearing That Could Have Ended It All
This week, the state board held a hearing to review the complaint. Investigators presented their findings. Board members debated. A Taylor Morrison representative urged the board to take action, warning that Porter’s videos were damaging and inappropriate.
But then came a key revelation.
The investigator assigned to the case stated there was no evidence that Porter lied in any of his videos.
None.
That single finding shifted the tone of the hearing.
“Protected Speech” or Professional Misconduct?
Board members did not all agree.
One member argued that Porter’s approach crossed professional boundaries and warranted discipline. Another countered that Porter’s videos were a form of protected expression, sharing factual observations and consumer education.
The central question became this:
Can a licensed professional be disciplined for publicly sharing truthful findings — even if those findings embarrass powerful companies?
For many watching, the answer carried implications far beyond one inspector.
The Final Decision
After deliberation, the board reached its conclusion.
Porter would not be disciplined.
His license would remain active. No suspension. No penalties. No restrictions.
The ruling effectively rejected Taylor Morrison’s claims and affirmed that the inspector’s videos did not violate professional standards.
For Porter’s supporters, it was a victory for transparency.
For critics, it was a troubling precedent.
Why This Case Matters to Homebuyers
Arizona is one of the fastest-growing housing markets in the country. New construction is everywhere — and many buyers assume “brand new” means “problem-free.”
Porter’s videos challenge that assumption.
Consumer advocates say inspections like his:
- Empower buyers
- Force accountability
- Encourage builders to address issues sooner
They also warn that silencing inspectors could leave homeowners vulnerable.
“If inspectors are afraid to speak,” one advocate noted, “consumers lose.”
Taylor Morrison’s Position
Taylor Morrison has maintained that the videos were misleading and damaging to its reputation. The company’s representative argued during the hearing that Porter’s license should be suspended to prevent what they described as unfair targeting.
However, without evidence of falsification, the board declined to act.
A Bigger Debate Just Getting Started
The case has ignited a broader discussion about:
- Social media and professional conduct
- Corporate power versus individual voices
- Where education ends and “harassment” begins
Some industry insiders worry that viral inspectors could sensationalize minor issues. Others argue that sunlight is exactly what the industry needs.
The Question That Won’t Go Away
One inspector. One builder. One board decision.
But the ripple effects are just beginning.
If a home inspector can legally expose construction flaws — even when billion-dollar companies object — what does that mean for the future of housing transparency?
And if this complaint failed…
Will builders try again — or think twice before challenging someone with the evidence on camera?